<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Early Peek at November 2008 Market Results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://repdx.com/2008/12/05/early-peek-at-november-2008-market-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://repdx.com/2008/12/05/early-peek-at-november-2008-market-results/</link>
	<description>Portland Oregon Real Estate Search</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 20:31:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Portland Oregon Real Estate Agent Blog &#187; Portland Real Estate Results - November 2008</title>
		<link>http://repdx.com/2008/12/05/early-peek-at-november-2008-market-results/comment-page-1/#comment-734</link>
		<dc:creator>Portland Oregon Real Estate Agent Blog &#187; Portland Real Estate Results - November 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.repdx.com/?p=642#comment-734</guid>
		<description>[...] released the November 2008 report and it corroborates what I had reported last week &#8212; weak unit sales and falling sale [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] released the November 2008 report and it corroborates what I had reported last week &#8212; weak unit sales and falling sale [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP</title>
		<link>http://repdx.com/2008/12/05/early-peek-at-november-2008-market-results/comment-page-1/#comment-736</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.repdx.com/?p=642#comment-736</guid>
		<description>Ron-

I am still waiting to hear who is helped by leftward shift of the demand curve.  (Normally I don&#039;t use graphs, but it is so pervasive in economics that it seems appropriate here).

The official RMLS numbers will be out soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron-</p>
<p>I am still waiting to hear who is helped by leftward shift of the demand curve.  (Normally I don&#8217;t use graphs, but it is so pervasive in economics that it seems appropriate here).</p>
<p>The official RMLS numbers will be out soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uncle_git</title>
		<link>http://repdx.com/2008/12/05/early-peek-at-november-2008-market-results/comment-page-1/#comment-735</link>
		<dc:creator>uncle_git</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 23:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.repdx.com/?p=642#comment-735</guid>
		<description>http://www.luxist.com/2008/12/13/portland-condo-offers-overnight-stays-to-lure-buyers/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.luxist.com/2008/12/13/portland-condo-offers-overnight-stays-to-lure-buyers/" rel="nofollow">http://www.luxist.com/2008/12/13/portland-condo-offers-overnight-stays-to-lure-buyers/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: squeezed</title>
		<link>http://repdx.com/2008/12/05/early-peek-at-november-2008-market-results/comment-page-1/#comment-720</link>
		<dc:creator>squeezed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 01:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.repdx.com/?p=642#comment-720</guid>
		<description>Most of the banks that failed during great depression I were tiny operations. WAMU alone was almost as large as all of the thrifts that failed in the S&amp;L crisis COMBINED.  I would not be surprised to see complete nationalization of out banking system.


&quot;I think Portland has a good chance of remaining somewhat more insulated than other parts of the US.&quot;

Care to explain why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of the banks that failed during great depression I were tiny operations. WAMU alone was almost as large as all of the thrifts that failed in the S&amp;L crisis COMBINED.  I would not be surprised to see complete nationalization of out banking system.</p>
<p>&#8220;I think Portland has a good chance of remaining somewhat more insulated than other parts of the US.&#8221;</p>
<p>Care to explain why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Brown</title>
		<link>http://repdx.com/2008/12/05/early-peek-at-november-2008-market-results/comment-page-1/#comment-727</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 22:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.repdx.com/?p=642#comment-727</guid>
		<description>First off
I will correct my earlier comment to clarify, it should read. &quot; In 1929 there was no &quot;Fed&quot; as we know it today&quot; and more importantly &quot;our bottoms are always behind us&quot;. As far as calling a bottom, I do believe that the worst is over and the recovery is well underway and hopefully we can call this the beginning of the bottom here in the Northwest. At the least I am going to defer to Cramer (Mad Money) and suggest, since he is always right, that the real bottom is 204 days from now.  Of course I have never actually invested in anything based on his advice so it is easier to believe everything he says. That being said, I don’t think any of us have the answers and it is all speculation regardless of history and statistics.  I for one will still be hanging on to my bottom while trying not to look back at it much in the New Year. I am convinced that if isn’t in our rear view mirror; the rear is at least near.


There are two things on the modification issue that bug me. One is the low number of people that are actually being helped and the other is that high # of second default you mentioned. I hadn’t heard the exact # but had heard it was high.  So many people were given loans they simply couldn’t afford and they are now simply getting another loan they still can’t afford.
This is one of those don’t get me started subjects. How about FHA Secure that was designed for homeowners in trouble. You can’t get the loan unless you are in trouble and most lenders won’t approve the loan if you have a Mortgage slow. Go figure. We are just unloading our Congressional shotguns on some of this stuff and missing our target. I will say that it is a beautiful thing however when you see someone get modified that it does rescue from foreclosure, especially those that didn’t wedge themselves into something they couldn’t afford or speculated or worse yet lied. The 41% left over I guess are pretty precious.

On the Portland Realestate-topia Q. I think Portland has a good chance of remaining somewhat more insulated than other parts of the US. We often do have higher unemployment #&#039;s than the rest of the US even during real estate growth periods. It is a wild card though. I don’t doubt that the jobs numbers are going to be bleak going forward and the historical correlation between jobs and rates (and real estate) are undeniable. We can compare this period to any number of periods statistically however it just aint so. This situation is different and very new.  We can get some bearing from history and economic theory but this is one strange time in our world. I am betting that unemployment continues to look Poooopy to Pooopier (howz that for technical?) and we still see the start of a housing recovery or at the least stabilization while it peaks.
I think the same Economy on Crack or more accurately Real Estate Economy on Crack is going to be revived by some of the same drugs that inflamed it. It is sort of looking like economic Methadone for a Heroine Housing addiction.  Albeit artificial and possibly temporary, all of the intervention including the modifications, forcing rates lower by purchasing Mortgage debt etc. will or is bringing about the correction; it just may not bring about a real cure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off<br />
I will correct my earlier comment to clarify, it should read. &#8221; In 1929 there was no &#8220;Fed&#8221; as we know it today&#8221; and more importantly &#8220;our bottoms are always behind us&#8221;. As far as calling a bottom, I do believe that the worst is over and the recovery is well underway and hopefully we can call this the beginning of the bottom here in the Northwest. At the least I am going to defer to Cramer (Mad Money) and suggest, since he is always right, that the real bottom is 204 days from now.  Of course I have never actually invested in anything based on his advice so it is easier to believe everything he says. That being said, I don’t think any of us have the answers and it is all speculation regardless of history and statistics.  I for one will still be hanging on to my bottom while trying not to look back at it much in the New Year. I am convinced that if isn’t in our rear view mirror; the rear is at least near.</p>
<p>There are two things on the modification issue that bug me. One is the low number of people that are actually being helped and the other is that high # of second default you mentioned. I hadn’t heard the exact # but had heard it was high.  So many people were given loans they simply couldn’t afford and they are now simply getting another loan they still can’t afford.<br />
This is one of those don’t get me started subjects. How about FHA Secure that was designed for homeowners in trouble. You can’t get the loan unless you are in trouble and most lenders won’t approve the loan if you have a Mortgage slow. Go figure. We are just unloading our Congressional shotguns on some of this stuff and missing our target. I will say that it is a beautiful thing however when you see someone get modified that it does rescue from foreclosure, especially those that didn’t wedge themselves into something they couldn’t afford or speculated or worse yet lied. The 41% left over I guess are pretty precious.</p>
<p>On the Portland Realestate-topia Q. I think Portland has a good chance of remaining somewhat more insulated than other parts of the US. We often do have higher unemployment #&#8217;s than the rest of the US even during real estate growth periods. It is a wild card though. I don’t doubt that the jobs numbers are going to be bleak going forward and the historical correlation between jobs and rates (and real estate) are undeniable. We can compare this period to any number of periods statistically however it just aint so. This situation is different and very new.  We can get some bearing from history and economic theory but this is one strange time in our world. I am betting that unemployment continues to look Poooopy to Pooopier (howz that for technical?) and we still see the start of a housing recovery or at the least stabilization while it peaks.<br />
I think the same Economy on Crack or more accurately Real Estate Economy on Crack is going to be revived by some of the same drugs that inflamed it. It is sort of looking like economic Methadone for a Heroine Housing addiction.  Albeit artificial and possibly temporary, all of the intervention including the modifications, forcing rates lower by purchasing Mortgage debt etc. will or is bringing about the correction; it just may not bring about a real cure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bearlee</title>
		<link>http://repdx.com/2008/12/05/early-peek-at-november-2008-market-results/comment-page-1/#comment-733</link>
		<dc:creator>bearlee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 20:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.repdx.com/?p=642#comment-733</guid>
		<description>Hey Stuart, you might have missed this news:

58% of Modified Mortgages Re-default after 8 Months: Why are Loan Modifications not Working?


The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency released data today showing that over half of modified mortgages are back in default after only 6 months.  More startling data is that 36 percent of the borrowers re-defaulted after only 3 months.  What this is telling us is that modifications are not helping to buffer the housing market in any significant measure.

http://www.mybudget360.com/58-of-modified-mortgages-re-default-after-8-months-why-are-loan-modifications-not-working/



How do you think all these lay-offs are going to effect housing?  Or is Portland still residing in that special immunity bubble?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Stuart, you might have missed this news:</p>
<p>58% of Modified Mortgages Re-default after 8 Months: Why are Loan Modifications not Working?</p>
<p>The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency released data today showing that over half of modified mortgages are back in default after only 6 months.  More startling data is that 36 percent of the borrowers re-defaulted after only 3 months.  What this is telling us is that modifications are not helping to buffer the housing market in any significant measure.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mybudget360.com/58-of-modified-mortgages-re-default-after-8-months-why-are-loan-modifications-not-working/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mybudget360.com/58-of-modified-mortgages-re-default-after-8-months-why-are-loan-modifications-not-working/</a></p>
<p>How do you think all these lay-offs are going to effect housing?  Or is Portland still residing in that special immunity bubble?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://repdx.com/2008/12/05/early-peek-at-november-2008-market-results/comment-page-1/#comment-725</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.repdx.com/?p=642#comment-725</guid>
		<description>“In 1929 there really wasn’t a “Fed”, no FDIC existed and 4000 banks failed. Today 18 banks failed,”

The Federal Reserve System (the Fed) a central banking system operating as a quasi-public entity was created in 1913 by the enactment of the Federal Reserve Act. The FDIC was created in 1933 in response to thousands of bank failures, which today is still an entity whose existence is debatable.

As for real estate bottoming because of buying by early investors; I would look at Japan for historical reference. One could also look to the past “dot com” buying as the market stabilized then tanked washing out the “catching a falling knife investors.” The bottom is always hindsight. To call a bottom is speculation, which might be true but I am not that much of a speculator or gambler. I will always follow the motto “the trend is your friend,” and I will always invest with the trend in any market.

Best of luck to you, Stuart, I hope you are right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“In 1929 there really wasn’t a “Fed”, no FDIC existed and 4000 banks failed. Today 18 banks failed,”</p>
<p>The Federal Reserve System (the Fed) a central banking system operating as a quasi-public entity was created in 1913 by the enactment of the Federal Reserve Act. The FDIC was created in 1933 in response to thousands of bank failures, which today is still an entity whose existence is debatable.</p>
<p>As for real estate bottoming because of buying by early investors; I would look at Japan for historical reference. One could also look to the past “dot com” buying as the market stabilized then tanked washing out the “catching a falling knife investors.” The bottom is always hindsight. To call a bottom is speculation, which might be true but I am not that much of a speculator or gambler. I will always follow the motto “the trend is your friend,” and I will always invest with the trend in any market.</p>
<p>Best of luck to you, Stuart, I hope you are right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uncle_Git</title>
		<link>http://repdx.com/2008/12/05/early-peek-at-november-2008-market-results/comment-page-1/#comment-728</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncle_Git</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 00:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.repdx.com/?p=642#comment-728</guid>
		<description>The cavalry can come all it wants - you just can&#039;t argue with the math.  And the new lending standards coupled with income levels in PDX indicate much more pain coming next year - and a drop of the FHA loan limit for the Portland metro area from $415k to $360k ish

I&#039;d love to know how those  inventory numbers are indicating a bottom ?

Maybe a bottom as far as sales numbers go - but we&#039;ve a long road ahead with inventory still elevated and foreclosures on the rise.

FWIW the MBA mortgage application numbers are bogus - people had locked rates and then we got a hard down spike in rates so they simply reapplied to get the new, now lower rates...  One buyer - two mortgage apps - I&#039;d have thought you would have seen some of this yourself as a mortgage broker ?

I guess I&#039;ll mark this down as the start of the real estate biz PR campaign praying to stimulate a &quot;spring bounce&quot; though...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The cavalry can come all it wants &#8211; you just can&#8217;t argue with the math.  And the new lending standards coupled with income levels in PDX indicate much more pain coming next year &#8211; and a drop of the FHA loan limit for the Portland metro area from $415k to $360k ish</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to know how those  inventory numbers are indicating a bottom ?</p>
<p>Maybe a bottom as far as sales numbers go &#8211; but we&#8217;ve a long road ahead with inventory still elevated and foreclosures on the rise.</p>
<p>FWIW the MBA mortgage application numbers are bogus &#8211; people had locked rates and then we got a hard down spike in rates so they simply reapplied to get the new, now lower rates&#8230;  One buyer &#8211; two mortgage apps &#8211; I&#8217;d have thought you would have seen some of this yourself as a mortgage broker ?</p>
<p>I guess I&#8217;ll mark this down as the start of the real estate biz PR campaign praying to stimulate a &#8220;spring bounce&#8221; though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP</title>
		<link>http://repdx.com/2008/12/05/early-peek-at-november-2008-market-results/comment-page-1/#comment-729</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 23:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.repdx.com/?p=642#comment-729</guid>
		<description>Stuart-

You&#039;re too funny.

&quot;Values are up. Yes it is only a little and one month does not make a trend but a bounce is a bounce. Don’t ignore it.&quot;

Uh, maybe you didn&#039;t bother to read what this blog entry is about, but values are down.

I don&#039;t know if you are calling the bottom in terms of number of sales, average price, median price, or some combination of these, but I&#039;ll mark you down as calling the bottom as of today.

(Even if you are the lucky one who actually did call the bottom at the right point, I would like to say I have heard these bottom calls by a whole host of people, including owners, buyers, sellers, mortgage brokers, REALTORs, and so on, for the last two to three years.  Don&#039;t get me wrong, you are two to three years closer in time than those others.)

Hopefully the economy, in general, will improve sooner rather than later.

Again, thanks for the laugh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stuart-</p>
<p>You&#8217;re too funny.</p>
<p>&#8220;Values are up. Yes it is only a little and one month does not make a trend but a bounce is a bounce. Don’t ignore it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Uh, maybe you didn&#8217;t bother to read what this blog entry is about, but values are down.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if you are calling the bottom in terms of number of sales, average price, median price, or some combination of these, but I&#8217;ll mark you down as calling the bottom as of today.</p>
<p>(Even if you are the lucky one who actually did call the bottom at the right point, I would like to say I have heard these bottom calls by a whole host of people, including owners, buyers, sellers, mortgage brokers, REALTORs, and so on, for the last two to three years.  Don&#8217;t get me wrong, you are two to three years closer in time than those others.)</p>
<p>Hopefully the economy, in general, will improve sooner rather than later.</p>
<p>Again, thanks for the laugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scone</title>
		<link>http://repdx.com/2008/12/05/early-peek-at-november-2008-market-results/comment-page-1/#comment-731</link>
		<dc:creator>scone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 21:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.repdx.com/?p=642#comment-731</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s possible to over-rationalize economic behavior, especially when it comes to homes. We had years of irrational exuberance, and now we are having a period of irrational fear. There is no sure way to tell how long the fear will go on, but the unemployment numbers will be telling. If we keep losing jobs through the spring and summer, sales may get even worse. If job numbers stabilize, people may start to feel a little better about big-ticket items. But even if they do, they&#039;ll be looking for bargains-- the easy money to finance the otherwise unaffordable home is gone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s possible to over-rationalize economic behavior, especially when it comes to homes. We had years of irrational exuberance, and now we are having a period of irrational fear. There is no sure way to tell how long the fear will go on, but the unemployment numbers will be telling. If we keep losing jobs through the spring and summer, sales may get even worse. If job numbers stabilize, people may start to feel a little better about big-ticket items. But even if they do, they&#8217;ll be looking for bargains&#8211; the easy money to finance the otherwise unaffordable home is gone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

